OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [office] Re: ODF 1.3 CS02 RNG & ODT


Hi Svante

 

Fixing the styles generally throughout the ODF 1.3 ODT documents is a big job and not going to get done by Monday. I reckon that Patrick and I can get it done by July 23rd, but not much sooner than that. I plan to give a fuller report tomorrow on the list.

 

Kind regards,

 

Francis

 

 

 

From: Svante Schubert <svante.schubert@gmail.com>
Sent: 02 July 2020 01:51
To: Francis Cave <francis@franciscave.com>
Cc: Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>; office@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [office] Re: ODF 1.3 CS02 RNG & ODT

 

Hello editors,

 

Now, I have added as well the ODT2HTML XSL transformations for part3 of ODF 1.2 and ODF 1.3 to my copied repository.

Earlier I thought there was a regression in the XSLT, but now when using the same tools for ODF 1.2 and 1.3 it became apparent that there are style problems in the ODF 1.3 document:

  1. The upper border of paragraph boxes is missing.
  2. The text line indent is too small
  3. Something is wrong with the font type compared to ODF 1.2 (I can not nail it down, but it looks 'cheap').

I have attached all result documents as ZIP to the email.

 

Good luck,

Svante

 

@TC members: 

As long you do not have access from OASIS to our odf-tc repository, email me your email  (or ID) used at GitHub and I provide you write access to my fork.

 

Am Do., 2. Juli 2020 um 01:11 Uhr schrieb Svante Schubert <svante.schubert@gmail.com>:

Hi Francis,

 

For now, I have provided a working default value extraction in my ODF-TC Github fork for the editors: https://github.com/svanteschubert/odf-tc

 

As you can read from the repository description, I have added a rudimentary extraction of default values from part 3 triggered by Maven using Saxon XSLT.

To quickly summarize, there are four different specification files as input. Both ODF 1.2 and ODF 1.3 not returning any values and two fixed versions - the ODF 1.3 you sent two days ago.

The output of ODF 1.2 and ODF 1.3 is quite close, you might want to take a closer look.

You find the files attached or if the tests triggered by command line "mvn clean install" the are beyond: target/generated-resources/xml/xslt

 

Godspeed!

Svante

 

Am Di., 30. Juni 2020 um 23:11 Uhr schrieb Francis Cave <francis@franciscave.com>:

Hi Svante

 

The CSD02 ODT and RNG files, excluding Part 1, are available from here. Part 1 is available from here.

 

Iâm glad that your PS was followed by a wink! It will take more than a few days to fix all the styles.

 

However, I have gone through Part 3 and, partly programmatically and partly manually, re-applied the paragraph style âDefault Valueâ to paragraphs that specify default attribute values. I have also applied the character style âAttribute Valueâ where this should have been applied in several places. I have left unchanged several cases where the character style âAttribute Value Instanceâ has been applied instead of âAttribute Valueâ. I attach the result. Note that this is not an official draft so should only be used for testing purposes.

 

Kind regards,

 

Francis

 

 

From: office@lists.oasis-open.org <office@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of Svante Schubert
Sent: 30 June 2020 19:53
To: Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>; Francis Cave <francis@franciscave.com>
Cc: office@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [office] Re: ODF 1.3 CS02 RNG & ODT

 

PS: It might be as well a good opportunity for you to fix the default values styles. ;-)

 

Am Di., 30. Juni 2020 um 20:16 Uhr schrieb Svante Schubert <svante.schubert@gmail.com>:

Dear editors,

 

Could you provide the ODT & RNG files ahead of the call, so I might have a chance to take a quick at the HTML transformation?

And might provide HTML versions of the RNG files according to the state of the art behaviour of RFC?

 

Thanks in advance,

Svante



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]