RE: [oic] Version Control Commit by bart.hanssens - file names ofadvisories

[Hanssens Bart <Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be>]

Hi Dennis,


> I think there are two separate issues.

Indeed

> One is not about hiding tracked changes so much as extracting in-line text
> (which will exclude tracked changes).  It looks like the problem first seen
> is related to doing that incorrectly (and a bug in the list of exceptions to
> in-line text). 

That would be the OFFICE-2706, correct ?

>This applies to many other situations.

Mm, like annotations ? Or other implementations (eg: search engines indexing
"removed" text)


> Another is about what to do when tracked-changes are not supported and
> whether producers that do not support tracked changes should preserve the
>text:tracked-changes element and the markers that show up in the character
> data of the in-line text.
>
> It would be valuable to deal with these as a pair, not as one.

So should we create a separate Advisory for that ? Or just deal with it in the
same Advisory, but make a clear distinction between them ?


> I haven't looked closer, but the name change seems to invite treating them
> together.

Actually I was focusing on the first one ("if you don't support changes, do not
render the contents of the text:p and text:h's inside text:tracked-changes as if
it was part of the document flow")


Best regards,

Bart