oiic-formation-discuss message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
- From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
- To: "David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:41:44 -0400
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com>
wrote on 06/11/2008 02:45:12 PM:
> 2008/6/11 Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>:
>
> > I think that your comments on the Acid Test are on the mark,
though it could
> > be preferable to capture the enthusiasm now rather than stifling/deferring
> > it
>
>
> Seconded. (I was about to write something like this.) Capturing
> enthusiasm right now is *very important*. It can be filtered later
-
> but pre-filtering kills input.
>
> This means a wiki, a shared Google doc, anything to act as Massively
> Multiplayer Online Notepad to capture immediate ideas. Something at
> all right now is better than The Perfect Right Thing later.
>
> Everyone has an idea of what interoperability is and isn't (i.e. they
> know very well when something isn't), even if they don't have the
> words at the top of their minds ready to write.
>
OK. That's a good idea. If we can redirect
the non-charter items to a wiki or whatever, the we can capture those ideas
for later reference. If someone can provide direction there, I'll
concentrate on leading the discussion on the charter questions.
> There's calls out across the net for people to
come to this list and
> look at what's going on - harnessing (and slightly directing) that
> enthusiasm is vitally important, because it won't keep if quashed.
>
Isn't there anyone out there enthused about drafting
charters? ;-)
-Rob
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]