[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage
1F. I've seen the other suggestions, and they seem reasonable. I think there is a minor clarification between types of "users". The majority of the users will be typical end users. But some will be "power users". Bankers, or anyone using more advanced formulas in spreadsheets. Administrators doing mail merge operations on their word processors. etc. These "power users" will using areas of the document standard that the typical end user wouldn't. 1G. I'm Canadian, eh?! Do I really need to use US English?? :) But English seems to be the appropriate language. Which classification doesn't matter too much to me - that's what my spell checker is for. Shawn robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote: > > OK. Sounds like no objection to 'RF on Limited Terms' for an IPR mode > for the proposed TC. Let's record that. > > Two more to discuss: > > /1f. The anticipated audience or users of the work./ > /1g. The language in which the TC shall conduct business./ > > (And yes, I am holding off on the big questions -- statement of purpose > and scope. We still have some "big picture" side discussions ongoing, > and when these are resolved we may have greater consensus on the big > questions. Or maybe we won't.) > > -Rob >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]