[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition.
2008/6/18 <firstname.lastname@example.org>: >> Nice to see we are not the only ones who have difficulty coming up with >> a definitive description of a profile. I think it is saying something >> when a "sample" of a profile is given to describe what a profile is. >> Sort of like using a word to describe itself. >> >> I believe the Wikipedia definition is the most generic and probably the >> most appropriate for our needs here. (of those listed) >> > > But don't forget the ISO definition that I sent out a few days ago: "a > "harmonised document which identifies a standard or group of standards, > together with options and parameters, necessary to accomplish a function or > set of functions". Which is not much use in our context Rob? (Not that I understand it anyway in our context) As I said, as used on this list. Not to be part of the TOR of the TC so it doesn't necessarily have to be called up from this groups output. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk