Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC

[Sunny Dubey <sunny@audiowiki.org>]

-1

Please unsubscribe.  Some work is better than no work.  And you sir, are a 
drama queen.

On Wednesday 18 June 2008 06:20:28 pm marbux wrote:

> Just as suspected. IBM is unwilling to disclose its real agenda for
> this TC.
>
> Unless you disclose IBM's real agenda for this TC, the only reasonable
> inference from surrounding circumstances and from your proposals,
> decisions as this meeting's leader, and your responses to proposals
> carefully designed to actually achieve a specification requiring
> interoperable implementations is that this proposed TC is nothing but
> smoke and mirrors to distract public attention from the negotiation
> among the big vendors on the ODF TC.
>
> We've all been deceived folks. The big vendors don't want folks
> watching their real negotiation. There is nothing to this proposed TC
> actually intended to achieve the interoperability of ODF
> implementations.
>
> Regretfully,
>
> Paul E. Merrell, J.D. (Marbux)