[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same
email@example.com wrote: > If there is consensus to make CDRF based profiles, then we would add > that to the list of deliverables. If there was consensus to require > only CDRF based profiles, then we would add that restriction to the > scope statement. But I'm not hearing consensus on either of those. The rotten part IMHO is that the CDRF spec actually deals with two issues: compound documents and profiles. I don't think the compound documents stuff is particularly interesting for ODF or how that part would impact ODF, but the bits about the profiles is certainly interesting. Perhaps there is a way to just use the profiles aspect of CDRF and leave out the rest? Would it be easier to achieve consensus on just that part?