Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same

[Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com>]

robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
> If there is consensus to make CDRF based profiles, then we would add
> that to the list of deliverables.  If there was consensus to require
> only CDRF based profiles, then we would add that restriction to the
> scope statement.  But I'm not hearing consensus on either of those.

The rotten part IMHO is that the CDRF spec actually deals with two
issues: compound documents and profiles. I don't think the compound
documents stuff is particularly interesting for ODF or how that part
would impact ODF, but the bits about the profiles is certainly interesting.

Perhaps there is a way to just use the profiles aspect of CDRF and leave
out the rest? Would it be easier to achieve consensus on just that part?