[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
2008/6/20 Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com>: > It has to do with the inability to define what a "profile" is. We don't want > to attempt to hammer out a definition of and ODF profile on this list and > nail the TC down to it (see the CDRF discussion). We do have some rough > understanding of what ODF profiles should do. What kind of interop we would > like to achieve by using profiles. > > So, instead of hammering out a definition for profiles, can we together on > this list write a set of use-cases of the kind of interop that profiles > should fulfill, and then ask the TC to: > > 1) Research and develop a formal definition/spec/requirements of what an ODF > profile is. One that satisfies all the use-cases we would develop. > > 2) Dictate that when ODF profiles are being developed by the TC, that they > will use the requirements written under (1). +1 I think that is on the cards now? http://sites.google.com/a/odfiic.org/tc/profiles can be used to collate examples if Mary/Rob aren't comfortable having them in the document that goes to the TC. > Both Garry Hurley and I don't know if it's possible to set a TC to work with > use-cases and ask "make us something that does this". Is that possible under > OASIS process? How would it work? Should it be in the charter? The list of > deliverables? A combination of both? What would the language be like? I doubt it, since it's not within the list outlined in the http://sites.google.com/a/odfiic.org/tc/Home/22-tc-formation policy and guidelines (as far as I can see) "Includes *only* the following" .... > > My hope is that it is far easier for this list to reach consensus on a set > of use-cases instead of on a formal definition, and we would not limit the > TC unnecessarily to boot. Hopefully this satisfies everyone's interests > (Rob's that we don't nail the TC down too much, Marbux's that we don't give > the TC a carte blanche. Etcetera) +1 Fully agree. I'm sure we can get a message to the TC, once formed that our thoughts are at http://sites.google.com/a/odfiic.org/tc/profiles on what a profile is? Either add them to the website or to the list and I'll add them. HTH -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]