OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

oiic-formation-discuss message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?

NO pixel perfect.  ODF is not PDF


Dave Pawson wrote:
711a73df0806302233h3d8f3318t1fc6a5620c6ee6c1@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">
I think I'm doing a Rob Weir.

Proposal for consensus: Please respond if you support it.

"There will be no deliverable addressing the ideas of 'pixel perfect' as
used on this list. "

Please respond or you'll have one mans version of consensus.

2008/7/1 Art Petrzelka <art@complum.com>:

Let's get the right scale here.

My list of must haves:
correct pagination
correct margins and tabs
identical line breaks
proper scaling - e. g. lines or blocks don't overlap
font substitution is appropriate and doesn't throw off pagination
bullets don't turn into an empty rectangle

Nice, but no coconut. What does 'correct', 'proper' mean
The last two are system dependent (installed fonts?) so inapproprite?

I guess identical line breaks is back to typesetting again?
Too close to pixel perfect for me (tell me if I'm wrong).
Identical pagination probably depends on line breaks ultimately
(tell me if I'm wrong), so -1

So this definition, whilst better (loosely named layout perfect in the past)
is still -1 from me.

I'd like something like this, but not if we can't define it.



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]