OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

oiic-formation-discuss message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?

On Tuesday 1. July 2008 18:54:54 Dave Pawson wrote:
> Simply because it isn't an Oasis standard at this time of writing.
> If, when the TC is constituted, 1.2 is the current Oasis standard,
> then quote that.
> Until then, 1.2 and any other 'non existant' Oasis standards are
> properly undefined
>  and hence created an undefined workload for the TC.

I don't buy this argument, explicitly forbidding the TC from working on a 
not-yet-published standard seems a bit extreme.
Your point that it creates an undefined workload is incorrect since the TC 
decides what it will work on, limiting what they are allowed to work on does 
nothing but limit the flexibility.  In various cases its a good thing, but 
using it to relieve pressure sounds like going the wrong way.

Do you have any other reasons for wanting this section in?
Thomas Zander

This is a digitally signed message part.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]