Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] TC formation proposal.

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

2008/7/22 Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com>:







> There was lots of talk about acid tests, and other such testing.  But in
> that I don't seem to recall any understanding that the TC would be
> responsible for building those tests - just defining the tests.  Again, same
> point as above.  But I'm just one voice.. :)

+1.
Robs suggestion early on, I still think it makes sense.




>> Off the Street Human Readable Documents.   No killer legal terms and
>> the like sneaking in please.
>
> The discussion thus far for the FAQ deliverable is more aimed at the sorts
> of questions an implementor may be asking.  But there is nothing saying we
> cannot put a plain language explanation of the TC's charter into the FAQs as
> well.  The FAQ can easily serve as a tool to express ideas or concerns the
> public and/or implementors may want to hear about.  In my opinion.. :)

Sounds good.


regards




-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk