RE: SLPF Public Review Comment: SLPF-5 SHOULD BE SLPF-4

["Brule, Joseph M" <jmbrule@radium.ncsc.mil>]

All, I am so sorry that I got the CRM number mixed up.  

SLPF-4 addresses the semantics associated with common arguments.  

SLPF-4 addresses the conformance should map to the schema.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Brule, Joseph M 
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 9:12 AM
To: 'openc2-actuator@lists.oasis-open.org' <openc2-actuator@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: RE: SLPF Public Review Comment: SLPF-5

All, 

A comment stating that conformance language for syntactically valid commands should map to the schema (vice property tables).  (Brule)

I created a Github issue number 22.  (https://github.com/oasis-tcs/openc2-apsc-stateless-packet-filter/issues issue number 22) 


I propose rewording of the SLPF to address these changes
(https://github.com/oasis-tcs/openc2-apsc-stateless-packet-filter/pull/33)

At your next opportunity, can you review the proposed resolution to the comment and if appropriate provide your insights?  


VR

Joe Brule 


Joe Brule
Engineering (Y2D122)
FNX-3, B4A335
410.854.4045
'Adnius ad retinedam puritem noster peciosus corporalis fluidorum...'
I welcome VSRE emails.  Learn more at http://vsre.info/