RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [openc2] Issues #5,6 on HTTPS... CSPRD

Dave,

I donât think anyone was seriously considering ignoring Duncanâs comment due to being âlateâ.

From: openc2@lists.oasis-open.org <openc2@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of Dave Lemire
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 12:54 PM
To: Duncan <duncan@sfractal.com>
Cc: OASIS OpenC2 List <openc2@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [openc2] Issues #5,6 on HTTPS... CSPRD

TC Members,

As editor of the HTTPS specification and co-chair of the IC-SC, I believe that the two issue Duncan references are important, and recommend that we do not ignore these comments. Insofar as they were actually submitted just prior to the October F2F, long before the public review, and were never fully resolved reinforces my opinion that they should be considered along with our other public review comments.

Dave

David P. Lemire, CISSP
OpenC2 Technical Committee Secretary
OpenC2 Implementation Considerations SC Co-chair
Contractor support to NSA
Email: dave.lemire@g2-inc.com
Office: 301-575-5190 / Mobile: 240-938-9350

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:19 AM duncan sfractal.com <duncan@sfractal.com> wrote:

I meant to reiterate HTTPSâ. Issues #5 (https://github.com/oasis-tcs/openc2-impl-https/issues/5) and #6 (https://github.com/oasis-tcs/openc2-impl-https/issues/6) as ballot comments. I forgot to do this which is totally my fault. By OASIS rules, the TC is allowed to ignore my comments but is not precluded from considering them.

Duncan Sparrell

sFractal Consulting LLC

iPhone, iTypo, iApologize

I welcome VSRE emails. Learn more at http://vsre.info/

openc2 message