[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [orms] Agenda: ORMS TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Wednesday 2009-10-28
I send another one for readability. > Use case name: e-auction seller reputation system > > Background: > > In Internet commerce, reputation systems in Internet commerce are > large-scale word of mouth networks to build "trust" among many members > in a community. Since the members' identifiers are often publicly > available in commerce sites, almost all Internet commerce sites allow > the members to use pseudonyms as their identity. > > It is difficult to use traditional means to build reputation on the > Internet because of its characteristics. Therefore, new ways of building > reputation in the Internet have emerged instead of traditional ones. For > example, eBay, the largest online auction site, developed the ingenious > reputation system which lets buyers and sellers to evaluate each other > and provides buyers information to see if sellers are trustworthy before > some transactions occur. Other reputation systems work in similar manners. > > It is no doubt that such reputation systems have helped adoption of > Internet commerce; however, > each reputation system in a different commerce site is proprietary. The > lack of portability of reputation data from one system to another may be > one of reasons preventing current reputation system from further innovation. > > Actors: > > Buyers, Sellers, Reputation System, Relaying party (of the system) > > Description: > > A buyer can check a seller's reputation which is collection of feedback > from other buyers based on past transactions before the buyer deiced to > do any transactions with the seller. The reputation system in the an > auction site provides the buyer a feature to show sellers' reputation > while he/she looks for products at the site. > > A buyer evaluates a seller on the reputation system in an auction site > after the transaction is completed. The buyer is allowed to grade the > seller with a simple scale like good/bad or 1 through 5. The system > gathers and aggregates the grades about the same seller from many > different buyers, and show the calculated result as a score. How to > calculate and show score varies in each site. > > If a seller wishes to export its reputation information in the system to > external relying parties, it should be able to do so. To make the > information valuable to outside of the system, buyers are identifiable. > Other attributes can be included however they must be protected if they > are sensitive information. In that case, data encryption and digital > signature may be desired solutions. Tatsuki Sakushima NRI Pacific - Nomura Research Institute America, Inc. TEL:(650)638-7258 SkypeIn:(650)209-4811 (11/19/09 3:52 PM), Tatsuki Sakushima wrote: > Hi, > > I wrote the "e-auction seller reputation system" use case. It has only > three labels(background, actors, description). > I guess we need to decide a format to capture other use cases. > > Tatsuki > > ---- > Use case name: e-auction seller reputation system > > Background: > > In Internet commerce, reputation systems in Internet commerce are > large-scale word of mouth networks to build "trust" among many members > in a community. Since the members' identifiers are often publicly > available in commerce sites, almost all Internet commerce sites allow > the members to use pseudonyms as their identity. > > It is difficult to use traditional means to build reputation on the > Internet because of its characteristics. Therefore, new ways of building > reputation in the Internet have emerged instead of traditional ones. For > example, eBay, the largest online auction site, developed the ingenious > reputation system which lets buyers and sellers to evaluate each other > and provides buyers information to see if sellers are trustworthy before > some transactions occur. Other reputation systems work in similar manners. > > It is no doubt that such reputation systems have helped adoption of > Internet commerce; however, > each reputation system in a different commerce site is proprietary. The > lack of portability of reputation data from one system to another may be > one of reasons preventing current reputation system from further innovation. > > Actors: > > Buyers, Sellers, Reputation System, Relaying party (of the system) > > Description: > > A buyer can check a seller's reputation which is collection of feedback > from other buyers based on past transactions before the buyer deiced to > do any transactions with the seller. The reputation system in the an > auction site provides the buyer a feature to show sellers' reputation > while he/she looks for products at the site. > > A buyer evaluates a seller on the reputation system in an auction site > after the transaction is completed. The buyer is allowed to grade the > seller with a simple scale like good/bad or 1 through 5. The system > gathers and aggregates the grades about the same seller from many > different buyers, and show the calculated result as a score. How to > calculate and show score varies in each site. > > If a seller wishes to export its reputation information in the system to > external relying parties, it should be able to do so. To make the > information valuable to outside of the system, buyers are identifiable. > Other attributes can be included however they must be protected if they > are sensitive information. In that case, data encryption and digital > signature may be desired solutions. > > > (10/28/09 1:14 PM), Mani, Mahalingam (Mani) wrote: >> Nat, >> >> I am yet to complete the section (which is still under way) fully >> describing the two use-cases (on UC) that I own. I will post them as >> separate document before deciding on a course of action on where to fold >> into (use-cases doc. and/or requirements as well). >> >> -mani >> -----Original Message----- >> From: n-sakimura@nri.co.jp [mailto:n-sakimura@nri.co.jp] Sent: >> Wednesday, October 28, 2009 10:05 AM >> To: orms@lists.oasis-open.org >> Cc: sakimura@gmail.com >> Subject: [orms] Agenda: ORMS TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Wednesday 2009-10-28 >> >> Following is the agenda for the official telecon of the ORMS TC at: >> >> Date: Thursday, 22 October 2009 USA >> Time: 2:00PM - 3:00PM Pacific Time (21:00-22:00 UTC, 06:00-07:00 JST) >> >> The telecon bridge supports both standard phone and direct Skype >> connections: >> >> 1) Skype Number: +9900827041051580 >> (this will connect you directly to the conference room) >> >> 2) US/Canada Toll number: United States: +1 (201) 793-9022 Canada: +1 >> (201) 793-9022 >> Conference Room Number: 1051580 >> >> AGENDA >> >> 1) Roll Call and selection of the Secretary for this meeting. >> 2) Progress from the Editing Team (Mani/Tatsuki) >> >> 3) INTERNET IDENTITY WORKSHOP >> >> Check on who is coming to the IIW next week. Seek possibility of >> having informal f2f there. >> 4) NEW BUSINESS >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]