oslc-core message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Re: Clarify GET on queryBase URI
- From: "Jim Amsden" <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
- To: David Honey1 <DavidHoney@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:00:12 -0400
I don't like the idea of commingling quality
of service and function. GET on the queryBase URI should be the same as
a oslc.where=true - select all members. If that's slow, its slow and clients
shouldn't do it. that's a typical negotiation between clients and servers
on any REST call.
Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member
OSLC and Linked Lifecycle Data
919-525-6575
From:
David Honey1 <DavidHoney@uk.ibm.com>
To:
Jim Amsden <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
Cc:
"OASIS OSLC Core
TC Discussion List" <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:
08/29/2018 06:59 AM
Subject:
[oslc-core]
Re: Clarify GET on queryBase URI
Sent by:
<oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>
Jim,
After thinking about this more, we might want to allow a server implementation
to return an error. In the case where there might be a very large number
of artifacts matching the RDF type of the query capability and the server
does not support paging, it might be useful to report an error as a means
of notifying a client that the result is likely to be very large and might
overwhelm the server, the client, or both. I've submitted https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-179so we can discuss in a future OSLC Core TC meeting.
Best regards,
David
From: Jim
Amsden/Raleigh/IBM
To: David
Honey1/UK/Contr/IBM@IBMGB
Date: 27/08/2018
15:00
Subject: Clarify
GET on queryBase URI
David,
One more thing - the Query spec doesn't actually say what would be returned
on a GET on the queryBase URI with now query parameters. This should be
clarified in the spec.
Similarly, we should probably say what GET on a creation factory URI would
mean.
Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member
OSLC and Linked Lifecycle Data
919-525-6575
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]