oslc-domains message

Subject: oslc:range oslc:AnyResource or more specific resource type?

From: "Jim Amsden" <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
To: "OASIS OSLC Domains TC Discussion List" <oslc-domains@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:13:19 -0500

I got my analysis mixed up. The more specific oslc:range assertions came from the resource shapes created for RQM. The QM 2.0 spec, https://archive.open-services.net/bin/view/Main/QmSpecificationV2.html,uses any for all the relationship names. So I think we should be consistent with the 2.0 spec and leave the oslc:AnyResource.

Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member
OSLC and Linked Lifecycle Data
919-525-6575

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [oslc-domains] oslc:range oslc:AnyResource or more specific resource type?
  - From: Andrii Berezovskyi <andriib@kth.se>