[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [pkcs11]: CKM_PKCS5_PBKD2_PARAMS struct: password length
On 04/17/2013 06:28 PM, Tim Hudson wrote:
On 18/04/2013 10:09 AM, Andrey Jivsov wrote:The definition of NULL in the C99 language standard defines NULL to be equal the numeric value 0.And that doesn't help - what you are looking for is that a pointer value cannot have the value 0 - and C99 does not define that - the pointer
I have difficulty locating the standard, but the interpretations of the C standard are abundant to at least strongly suggest to use NULL==0.
http://c-faq.com/null/5.5 talks about defining NULL to 0 even on machines that use non-zero bit patters to represent the NULL pointer.
passed incorrectly in ulPasswordLen can be zero and can still be valid.
It's likely that that these systems will not have PKCS#11 libraries running on them.
Re-reading C99 6.3.2.2 should make that clearer (although that is an unusual use of the word 'clearer'). However this is diverging from the main topic ... Tim. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]