[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [pkcs11] Groups - GMAC corrections and enhancements uploaded
David and all TC members, While reviewing the GMAC proposal I noticed that table 60 allows CKM_AES_GMAC not only for functions “Sign & Verify” but also for function
“Derive”. Does that make sense? CKM_AES_MAC, CKM_AES_CMAC and CKM_SHAnnn_HMAC are also not foreseen for key derivation. I suggest to remove the “√”
symbol for the Derive function. Thanks, Dieter From: pkcs11@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:pkcs11@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of David Gascon
Utimaco IS GmbH Germanusstr. 4, D.52080 Aachen, Germany, Tel: +49-241-1696-0, www.utimaco.com Seat: Aachen – Registergericht Aachen HRB 18922 VAT ID No.: DE 815 496 496 Managementboard: Malte Pollmann (Chairman) CEO, Dr. Frank J. Nellissen CFO This communication is confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at https://www.utimaco.com/en/e-mail-disclaimer/ |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]