[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: representing assembly and promissory usage
Hi We are trying to address the issues raised against representing assembly structure template
Issue: GYL-2 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-05-04) major_technical issue I would suggest not using the quanitity and location_indicator attributes, but use assignments instead. Comment: (Peter Bergström 2007-05-17)
It is not clear to me why you want to use a property rather than the quantity attribute Do you expect that the quantity will change through life? And therefore we need an assignment so that we can apply effectivity? If that was the case would you not have a separate assembly relationship each time with the effectivity applied?
I have also raised an issue against representing_promissory usage and representing_assembly stating that they should use the same approach. representing_assembly uses representing quantity – representing_promissory usage use the same approach
Regarding the location indicator – this is used to represent the occurrence of the product within an assembly – why not use the attribute? Regards -------------------------------------------
Registered Office: Cwttir Lane, St. Asaph, Denbighshire LL17 0LQ.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]