We offer
this as a contribution to the development of the final version. Feel free
to comment on any errors, misconceptions, inconsistencies etc.
-----Original Message-----
From: mats.nilsson@fmv.se
[mailto:mats.nilsson@fmv.se]
Sent: 06 October 2005 08:58
To: ils-dm@a.dii.mod.uk;
plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: SV: [plcs-tog] OASIS PLCS
TC concept model
I like
the slideshow. Excellent! Much easier to follow.
- In my
opinion, 'term' and 'name' are synonymns. A term has no definition. A term
"labels" a concept. A 'concept' has one or more terms/names
and a definition (possibly in different languages).
- Is 'EX
...' short for EXchange or should it be 'DEX ...'?
- There
are two 'ISO 10303 Application Module' boxes.
- I like
the idea of not using the 'Business Concept' term. I'm not sure I quite
understand what you've suggested instead. Could you explain it in words?!
Regards,
Mats
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mats
Nilsson, FMV
Från: Rutland,
Phil [mailto:ils-dm@a.dii.mod.uk]
Skickat: den 5 oktober 2005 17:22
Till: 'plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org'
Ämne: [plcs-tog] OASIS PLCS TC
concept model
All,
I've been looking at this and come up with the attached
version.
I've
removed "Business Concept" and tried to identify how OASIS DEX's are
created along with the link between various reference data levels.
It can
be viewed as a whole or in slideshow mode when it will build (my idea of trying
to explain it!).
-----Original Message-----
From: mats.nilsson@fmv.se
[mailto:mats.nilsson@fmv.se]
Sent: 03 October 2005 17:33
To: plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [plcs-tog] OASIS PLCS TC
concept model
Hi all,
I was given the task in Amsterdam to produce a first
draft of a 'OASIS PLCS TC concept model' in order to help to clarify the
meaning of the terms we comunicate between us. Please feel free to modify the
document during the discussion. I do not guarantee that the model is correct
even at this basic stage. More terms should be inserted and more connections
added.
<<OASIS PLCS TC
Concept Model.ppt>>
Two
thing are worth mentioning:
1- A suggestion from the TOG meeting in Amsterdam is
that the term "DEX" should no longer be used alone. Instead "DEX
Specification" should be used when refering to the specifications in
DEXlib. Packages of data exchanged between parties are from now on "DEX
Files". "DEX ..." is to be read as "Data Exchange
...". Anyone breaking the rule is punished with ten pushups!
2- The term "Business Concept" is not
clear. Therefore I've introduced the term "Business Concept Specification"
for the definition stored in DEXlib. The model hopefully makes this
understandable... More explanation regarding this new term (but old concept) is
needed.
My suggestion is that this concept model (when
"completed") will be considered as a guiding document after it has
been balloted.
Does anyone have access to a proper software
modelling tool instead of powerpoint?
Let the fight begin... ;o)
Vänliga hälsningar,
Mats
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mats
Nilsson
FMV
KE LogMetod, rum C358
PLCS - Product LifeCycle Support [ISO/IEC
10303-239:2005] är en standard innehållande ett språk för kommunikation av
(underhållsrelaterad) produktinformation mellan IT-system. Mer information
finns på iNSiDAN http://insidan.fmv.se/GetPage.asp?sPageId=036003002002001