RE: [plcs] Comments on the checklist

["Rob Bodington" <rob.bodington@eurostep.com>]

Good suggestion about recording the capability/DEX  revision Tim.

The revision of both DEXs and capabilities is in the XML:

 rcs.revision="$Revision: 1.14 $"  development.folder="dvlp"

 

It is also displayed in the top frame of the Capability:


Capability (C019): assigning_approvals - Assigning an Approval

Issues
<file:///D:\users\rbn\projects\sforge\dexlib\data\capabilities\assigning_app
rovals\dvlp\issues.xml> issues[0/0]

Date: 2004/05/12 09:24:22 
Revision: 1.16 

 

However, the revision is not displayed in the DEXs - not difficult to add

 

It would also be easy to provide a summary page on the DEX displaying the
revisions of the capabilities that have been used.

It would also probably be useful to display the revisions of the modules
used by the capabilities.

I will add this to the list of DEX issues: dexlib/docs/issues/issues.xml 

 

Regards
Rob

-------------------------------------------
Rob Bodington
Eurostep Limited
Web Page:   http://www.eurostep.com http://www.share-a-space.com
Email:  Rob.Bodington@eurostep.com
Phone:  +44 (0)1454 270030
Mobile: +44 (0)7796 176 401
Fax:    +44 (0)1454 270031  

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim [mailto:timturner11@bellsouth.net] 
Sent: 08 June 2004 21:35
To: plcs@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [plcs] Comments on the checklist

 

Dear All,

 

I have added some thoughts using the revision control in Word to the
attached document for consideration.

 

In addition to the checklist it seems apparant that the models are
constantly moving & it is difficult to understand if the comments are still
relevant by the time they are received. I think that we should at least
record the version of the capability against which the comments were raised
in addition to the date.

 

I believe that we will have the same problem when it comes to reviewing at
the Dex level. That is, which versions of the capabilities were part of the
Dex on a specific date when the review was done? If this could be automated
it would be useful - almost like an internal release system against which we
could record comments.

 

Cheers,

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Trine.Hansen@dnv.com [mailto:Trine.Hansen@dnv.com]
Sent: 08 June 2004 15:41
To: plcs@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [plcs] Notes from DEX conference call 8 June 2004

All. 
Please find some notes from the conference call today 8 June 2004.

Note 1: We'll try to arrange some reference data workshops in Bath in
connection with the ISO meeting. 
Note 2: Next conference call Monday 12 July, same time as usual and same
details 

I'm on summer vacation the next three weeks. 

<<Notes from DEX telecon 8 june 2004.doc>> 

Best Regards 
Trine Hansen 
UCTNO940, Information Quality Management 
Det Norske Veritas AS 
* + 47 67 57 96 38 (office) 
* + 47 90 83 44 24 (mobile) 
* trine.hansen@dnv.com 
 <http://www.dnv.com> http://www.dnv.com 



**************************************************************
Neither the confidentiality nor the integrity of this message can be
guaranteed following transmission on the Internet. 
All messages sent to a DNV email addressee are swept by Sybari Antigen for
the presence of computer viruses. 
DNV acknowledges that SPAM email represents a potential security risk, and
DNVs filters to block unwanted emails are therefore continuously adjusted.
DNV has disabled "out of office" replies to the Internet 
**************************************************************

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>