Possible inconsistency in SPMLv2 'suspend' capability

["Garza, Gabe" <Gabe.Garza@sabre.com>]

Hi,

We're currently implementing an SPML provider that will support the
'suspend' capability.  

Lines 3818 and 3819 state: "If the <suspendRequest> specifies an
"effectiveDate", the provider MUST enable the specified object as of
that date."  However, lines 3825-3828 state that if the date is in the
future then the provider MUST disable the object at that future date and
time.

I may be parsing it wrongs, but it seems like lines 3818-3819 contradict
lines 3825-3828.  What was the intention?  Should the effectiveDate on a
suspendRequest be the date that an object is disabled or the date that
an object is enabled?

Gabe Garza
Sabre Airline Solutions