RE: [provision] Updated Interop Spec

["Jeff Bohren" <jbohren@opennetwork.com>]

Title: Message

Looking at section 5 I have a couple of suggestions:

 

1) If we are only going to support add requests, but not modify or delete, we could use the addRequest without specifying the identifier. In this case each of the PSPs would return the SPML identifier which was derived from the provisioning data (which the client would ignore).

 

2) Once again I will raise my objection to mixing WS-Security into this interop. We have enough to worry about without adding this extra effort and risk. This is outside of the scope of the PS TC and has nothing to do with our efforts. To me, pretending we are doing WS-Security without actually enforcing it is worse than just not doing it all.

 

3) The attribute names in the sample add request do not match the SPML schema I sent out for review. We should change the sample to match the schema or vice-versa.

 

 

Jeff Bohren

Product Architect

OpenNetwork Technologies, Inc

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Darran Rolls [mailto:Darran.Rolls@waveset.com]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:41 PM
To: provision@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [provision] Updated Interop Spec

Folks

 

I have updated the interop spec, now available at [1].  I *really* need some help on section 5 so your review would be greatly appreciated.  I have also included the draft PeopleSoft web input forms and much detail on the interop venue and general logistics.  Many of these items will be discussed on Mondays call.

 

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/provision/download.php/2413/pstc-interop1-draft-03.doc

 

=========================================================

Darran Rolls                      http://www.waveset.com

Waveset Technologies Inc          drolls@waveset.com

=========================================================