RE: [public-sector-cloud-discuss] list of public sector cloud requirements

[Colin Wallis <Colin.Wallis@dia.govt.nz>]

So, putting together Peter's earlier thread with Tony's later one..

I agree with Peter's comment about the liaisons, which go further, as Tony alludes to.

To the 'unique selling point', I think Tony's list starts to get down to the kind of level of detail that might set this work apart. 

Cheers
Colin  

-----Original Message-----
From: public-sector-cloud-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:public-sector-cloud-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Tony Rutkowski
Sent: Friday, 8 June 2012 4:57 p.m.
Cc: public-sector-cloud-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [public-sector-cloud-discuss] list of public sector cloud requirements

Hi all,

The attached slide from one of my presentations at ISS here in Prague was intended as a listing of the emerging requirements.

Yaana Technologies would support the group's activities.

I also serve as ETSI TC LI's liaison to most external organizations with respect to the TC's work on Cloud/ Virtualization LI and Retained Data specifications as co-rapporteur of these work items.

best,
tony
.....................

Hi, in no particular order, just a few preliminary comments.

-	I would like, formally, to be added to the list of proposers. I thought that I had done this already, my apologies for being behind the curve...;
-	TC name is OK and I think it will be inevitable that the acronym "PACR" will be pronounced "pacer" - let's be ready for that!;
-	Relationship with other OASIS work: several TCs are working on related topics (IDCloud, TOSCA, PMRM, TGF, to name a few) - we need to be very clear about the "unique selling point" of this proposed TC and what gap it intends to fill (some personal ideas follow);
-	Relationship with ISO, especially JTC1/SC38/WG1 - we seem to have gotten off to a rocky start in our relationship with SC38 WG2 (covering SOA), with no information coming back from ISO about initiatives and relevant and valid OASIS work (such as the SOA-RM) not being promoted. We must ensure that the same fate does not befall any relationship with WG1 looking at cloud standards;
-	We should also look at several ISO standards that cover aspects of IT governance and cloud computing (for example ISO 10746, 15414, many of the 27000-series (in particular 207702, 27005, 27010, 27017 and 27018, 27036 parts 5 and 6, 30120 and 38500) and that may involve liaison with JTC1/WG6 and SC7/WG40.
-	The Transformational Government Framework TC has had success in the creation and use of a "pattern language" -this proposed TC would seem to occupy the same "level" of policy guidance rather than wanting to create down-in-the-weeds technical specifications. Could we maybe consider that a further set of patterns could be developed (at least as one of the proposed specifications) and that could mutually cross-reference with the TGF Patterns (particularly as we may be considering - within TGF and/or JTC1 SC?
My 0.02 worth at this early stage

Best regards,
Peter
====
CAUTION:  This email message and any attachments contain information that may be confidential and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Thank you.
====