RE: [regrep-cc-review] Discussion of 2 Functional Points

["CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@lmi.org>]

Title: Discussion of 2 Functional Points

Thanks for the updated version, Mark.

 

To all - I will do the following to bring us up to date with this version:

 

(1) Review the changes and send out a summary for the team

 

(2) Make any necessary updates to the Discovery/Submission Functional Points document and resend

 

(3) I will do the same for the Metadata Functional Points document

 

I plan to have these completed by mid to end of week.

 

Kathryn, thanks for your hard work on the Metadata Functional Points document - it turned out really well!

 

Joe

 

**************************************************************************
  Joseph M. Chiusano
  Logistics Management Institute
  2000 Corporate Ridge
  McLean, VA 22102
  Email: jchiusano@lmi.org
  Tel: 571.633.7722
**************************************************************************

-----Original Message-----
From: CRAWFORD, Mark
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:47 PM
To: CHIUSANO, Joseph; 'regrep-cc-review@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: RE: [regrep-cc-review] Discussion of 2 Functional Points

To all,

 

Attached is a copy of the latest version of the core components TS.  This version will be distributed by UN/CEFACT this week for a 30 day worldwide public comment period.  There are some changes from version 1.75, including some to the storage section. 

 

Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: CHIUSANO, Joseph [mailto:JCHIUSANO@lmi.org]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:42 PM
To: 'regrep-cc-review@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: [regrep-cc-review] Discussion of 2 Functional Points

Hi All,

I'd like to kick off a discussion of some of the registry-related functionality that is defined in the Core Components spec v1.75, to elicit ideas about how the functionality can be accomodated in our Registry architecture.  In the Discovery/Submission Functional Points mapping document, we have the following 2 functional points:

(1) The following relates to a search for a business process within the Registry: 

"If an existing business process is located that will be used, the new use should be identified to the registry"

(2) In the following, the user has already found a suitable business process, and has identified the relevant context categories of the business process:

"The registry will provide a list of pre-defined Business Information Entities that are available to the selected business process, and which meet the context criteria specified"

I'd like to get your feedback on the following:

For (1):  How can the "new use" be identified to the Registry?

For (2):  How can we associated business processes with BIE's in the Registry?

I welcome all ideas, big or small.

Thanks,
Joe

**************************************************************************
  Joseph M. Chiusano
  Logistics Management Institute
  2000 Corporate Ridge
  McLean, VA 22102
  Email: jchiusano@lmi.org
  Tel: 571.633.7722
**************************************************************************