RE: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!

[Diego Ballvé <diego.ballve@republica.fi>]

> Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> 
> > Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> >
> >> <Quote>
> >> By defining a hierarchty within the ObjectType scheme for 
> CCTS maybe.
> >> </Quote>
> >>
> >> I like that. How about this: On p.76 of CCTS (top), it 
> defines several
> >> metadata attributes for a Core Component. Two of these are:
> >>
> >> - Dictionary Entry Name
> >>
> > To RegistryObject.name
> >
> >> - Definition
> >>
> > To RegistryObject.description
> >
> >>
> >> How could we best incorporate these into the registry?
> >
> How did you map these Diego?

Exactly like you said.
If you check CCTS spec these 2 fields shall be in English but
can be translated... perfect for RIM's LocalizedStrings.
Besides, the semantics of the fields are very close in both
specs, just field names differ (though RIM does not enforce
uniqueness of Dictionary Entry Name (RegistryObject.name)).

Most of the other fields are mapped to slots and the
associations to RIM Associations (Contains and Extends).

Diego