RE: [regrep-cc-review] Re: Mapping Patterns

[Diego Ballvé <diego.ballve@republica.fi>]

> By defining a hierarchty within the ObjectType scheme for CCTS maybe.

Yep. That's what I've done.  Then ExtrinsicObjec.objectType contais
a reference to a Concept I have defined under a BusinessDocument
(should be CCTS) Concept node. The tree resemble to this:

ObjectType ClassicationScheme
 - xml
  - ebxml
   - ccts
    - ABIE
    - BBIE
    - ASBIE [1]
    - ACC    
    - BCC    
    - ASCC  [1]
    - ACCC  [2]
    - BCCC  [2]
    - ASCCC [1] [2]
    - CCT
    - DataType [3]

** Am I missing some concepts??

** Should long names be used for clarity??

[1] *Not used*!! In my implementation I do not store an Association
CC/BIE. I simply associate 2 aggregates with 'Contains'. Not needed???

[2] We used the concept of candidate so that 'our' CoreComponents
could be somehow replaced by CoreComponents from the catalog.

[3] Not present in my implementation but I see the need for it now.
For instance, to store localized enumeration/regexps. BIEs have
Contexts (Classifications) that could define the region where they
should be used.. Same CC, different BIE for different region,
different DataType, but still same CCT.

And what about Contexts? Do they need a pattern too? I've used RIM's
Classification mechanism for Contexts so that each Context Category
has it's own ClassificationScheme.

*** We've created our contexts even though the spec says that
contexts should be taken from many different specs/locations..

Diego

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:54 PM
> To: Nikola
> Cc: regrep-cc-review@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Re: Mapping Patterns [was: Kickoff!]
> 
> 
> Thanks Nicola. That answers the e-mail that I just sent asking you for
> another mapping pattern.
> 
> Would you be willing to keep a list of these mapping patterns for us?
> This will help us create a "RIM binding manual" for other 
> initiatives to
> use in creating their own RIM bindings (i.e. one step in a mapping
> scenario would be to define the mapping pattern you need to 
> use based on
> X available patterns, etc.).
> 
> Does anyone have any other suggestions for mapping patterns? 
> If not just
> yet, that's ok - they'll fall out of our future discussions.
> 
> Joe
> 
> Nikola wrote:
> > 
> > <Farrukh>
> > >Thanks Diego - But how would you capture in the registry that an
> > >ExtrinsicObject is an ABIE (Aggregate Business Information 
> Entity) vs.
> > >an ACC (Aggregate Core Component)?
> > >
> > By defining a hierarchty within the ObjectType scheme for 
> CCTS maybe.
> > </Farrukh>
> > 
> > +1.
> > 
> > Another pattern -> "ObjectTypeHierarchy"
> > 
> > Note: I realized that we might want to rename / branch out 
> the thread.
> > 
> > Nikola
> > 
> > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/
members/leave_workgroup.php