[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] What Will RepositoryItem Be? (Was: Re:[regrep-cc-review]Kickoff!)
<Quote> If the decision is that this effort is solely going to focus on CCTS - to the exclusion of other requirements - then I believe we need to go back to the main Registry TC to decide what the further go forward should be in addressing those requirements. </Quote> This effort is solely going to focus on CCTS. More specifically, Section 7 of the CCTS specification. Joe David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote: > > Message text written by "Chiusano Joseph" > > > I can clarify here please: the "basics" are those items defined in > Section 7 of the CCTS spec. As long as we have covered Section 7 of the > CCTS spec using the existing RIM and slots, we have accomplished our > mission. > <<<<<< > > Joe, > > I think you've moved the goal posts from what was proposed two or > three weeks ago at the start of this. > > While I'm pleased that - by insisting that we clarify the requirements > upfront before we start - that we are figuring out the intentions and > the goals here that you want to implement. > > However - these are falling well short of the total requirements > from the business perspective IMHO - and not only that - but > also a broader audience beyond that of CCTS alone. > > If the decision is that this effort is solely going to focus on > CCTS - to the exclusion of other requirements - then I > believe we need to go back to the main Registry TC to > decide what the further go forward should be in addressing > those requirements. > > Thanks, DW.
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:email@example.com title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard