[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [My Interpretation] Re: Question on CCTs vs Data Types
Alan, Perhaps this might help us: Here is how my interpretation (correct or perhaps not) of Data Type vs. CCT became more solidifed once I started getting down to the actual registration of the entities in an ebXML Registry: (1) User would register a CCT called "Country_Code" (not "Country. Code, because "Country" is actually a Representation Term Qualifier in this case not a Property Term), with the Supplementary Component attributes included in the registration (code list ID, agency, etc.) NOTE: I found it unncessary to register a separate "Supplementary Component" entity; instead, I represented the attributes from the "Supplementary Component" entity as Slots on the "Country_Code" CCT (2) If user would like to represent a subset of "Country_Code", they would now register a Data Type (which restricts a CCT) called "European_Country_Code" NOTE: - I found it unncessary to register separate "Supplementary Component Restriction" and "Content Component Restriction" entities; instead, I represented the attributes from the "Supplementary Component Restriction" entity as Slots on the "European_Country_Code" Data Type - There was no Content Component Restriction in this case, but if the Data Type were (for example) an amount, there could be a Content Component Restriction - I associated the Data Type in the registry with the "Country_Code" CCT (3) If the user would like to register another more specific set of codes based on the "European_Country_Code" Data Type (e.g. "West_European_Country_Code"), they would register a new Data Type called "West_European_Country_Code" that restricts the "European_Country_Code" Data Type further. NOTE: - I associated the new Data Type in the registry with the "European_Country_Code" Data Type - This possibility (Data Types building on other Data Types) is not mentioned in the CCTS, but seems logical to me Again, this may be totally off base, and if it is I would very much appreciate your expressing that. Thanks, Joe Joseph Chiusano wrote: > > Alan, > > Please feel free to remove the CC Review address when you reply (since > you're not a listserv member, you're getting that error). > > Regarding the attached file: It appears to "span" 2 entities in the > CCTS: Data Type and CCT. By that, I mean it specifies that "Country. > Identifier. Type" (doesn't matter for the purposes of this question > whether it is a Code or Identifier type) is a Data Type, yet it provides > the metadata (Identification Scheme. Identifier, etc.) for a CCT (i.e. > the attributes listed are those of a Supplementary Component, which is > associated with a CCT). How can this be possible, given Figure 7-1 in > the CCTS? > > Thanks in advance for your help, > Joe Chiusano and the Core Components Review SC > > Alan.Stitzer@marsh.com wrote: > > > > Joe, > > > > I get this email bounced back to me: > > regrep-cc-review@lists.oasis-open.org > > > > as taken from the TBG17 initial dictionary, this is what Country_ > > Identifier. Type looks like: > > > > (Embedded image moved to file: pic23038.pcx) > > > > ajs > > > > <<< Memo from chiusano_joseph@bah.com@Internet on 01 December, 2003, 12:21 > > Monday >>> > > > > chiusano_joseph@bah.com@Internet on 1 Dec 2003, 12:21 Monday > > > > To: Alan Stitzer > > cc: blantz; regrep-cc-review > > Subject: Re: Question on CCTs vs Data Types > > > > Thanks Alan. I would like to take your answer a step further, if it's > > ok: > > > > Since "Country_Code" is a Data Type, it has the following CCTS > > requirement: > > > > [S29] Stored Data Types shall have a Core Component Type as their basis. > > > > Given that, we would have the following CCT requirement: > > > > [S19] Core Component Types are a particular category of Core Components. > > As such, stored Core Component Types shall include all Attributes of > > stored Core Components. > > > > Given that, we would have the following "Store Component Components" > > requirement (explanations are snipped): > > > > [S1] Core Components are a particular category of Registry Classes. As > > such, all stored Core Components shall include the following Attributes: > > > > ? Unique Identifier (mandatory) > > ? Version (mandatory) > > ? Dictionary Entry Name (mandatory) > > ? Definition (mandatory) > > ? Usage Rule (optional, repetitive) > > > > What would the value for the "Dictonary Entry Name" attribute be for the > > corresponding CCT? Would it be "Code. Type"? If so, how can one specify > > the "Supplementary Component" attributes for the "Country_Code" Data > > Type (code list ID, agency, etc.) if they are tied to a single CCT > > called "Code. Type"? > > > > Thanks in advance for your help, > > Joe Chiusano and the Core Components Review SC > > > > > > > > Joe, > > > > > > >Is an entity named "Country_Code" a CCT or a Data Type? I interpret it > > > >as a CCT. > > > > > > Without getting into a debate that has raged on and on and on and > > > on....that would be a data type, however, we believe that it is an > > > identifier rather than a code. > > > > > > TBG17 has a defined data type called Country_ Identifier -- which > > restricts > > > the CCT identifier to the "correct" country (aarrgghh) code list. > > > > > > ____________________ > > > Alan Stitzer > > > AVP > > > Marsh USA Inc. > > > 1166 Avenue of the Americas > > > New York, NY 10036-2774 > > > Phone: (561) 743-1938 > > > Fax: (561) 743-1993 > > > Internet: Alan.Stitzer@marsh.com > > > ____________________ > > > > > > <<< Memo from chiusano_joseph@bah.com@Internet on 01 December, 2003, > > 11:51 > > > Monday >>> > > > > > > chiusano_joseph@bah.com@Internet on 1 Dec 2003, 11:51 Monday > > > > > > To: Alan Stitzer; blantz > > > cc: regrep-cc-review > > > Subject: Question on CCTs vs Data Types > > > > > > Mary Kay and Alan, > > > > > > We (the OASIS/ebXML Registry Core Components Review SC) have a question > > > on CCTs vs Data Types that we hope you can answer for us, as I don't > > > believe the answer is clear from the CCTS (or I have misinterpreted the > > > CCTS): > > > > > > Is an entity named "Country_Code" a CCT or a Data Type? I interpret it > > > as a CCT. > > > > > > More details: > > > > > > - According to Gunther's CCT document (XML representations), I believe > > > that Country_Code would be considered a CCT. > > > > > > - The issue underlying the question is that the CCTS lists multiple > > > Supplementary Component attributes (code list ID, agency, etc.) which - > > > I believe - would need to be tied to a specific code list (such as > > > "Country_Code") rather than a generic CCT called "Code. Type". > > > > > > - I'm sure how/why we would register a generic CCT called "Code. Type" - > > > i.e. what values would the attributes (code list ID, agency, etc.) have? > > > > > > - So a more "specific" Country_Code - e.g. European_Country_Code - would > > > be a Data Type (not a CCT), which restricts the CCT called > > > "Country_Code" to inlcude only those codes from European countries. > > > > > > Thanks in advance for your help, > > > Joe Chiusano and the Core Components Review SC > > > (See attached file: Chiusano_Joseph.vcf) > > > > > > To: Alan Stitzer/NYC-NY/US/Marsh/MMC@MMC, > > blantz@attglobal.net@Internet > > > cc: regrep-cc-review@lists.oasis-open.org@Internet > > > From: chiusano_joseph@bah.com@Internet > > (See attached file: Chiusano_Joseph.vcf) > > > > To: Alan Stitzer/NYC-NY/US/Marsh/MMC@MMC > > cc: blantz@attglobal.net@Internet, > > regrep-cc-review@lists.oasis-open.org@Internet > > From: chiusano_joseph@bah.com@Internet > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Name: pic23038.pcx > > pic23038.pcx Type: PCX Image (application/x-unknown-content-type-pcxfile) > > Encoding: base64 > > Download Status: Not downloaded with message
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]