RE: [regrep-comresolve] Issue database distribution: 3/15/2002

["Munter, Joel D" <joel.d.munter@intel.com>]

Farrukh, et al,

Here are some preliminary notes for today's meeting.  I was working directly
from the table as the content appears to be truncated going to the MS/report
itself.

Please remove items: 
	163, this was resolved before the spec went into the 90-day review
period
	165, this was resolved before the spec went into the 90-day review
period
	166, this comment was not specific, therefore, please delete it
	
As I stated in several eMails, I knew that some of these were resolved or
irrelevant.  I apologize for not being more specific until now.  I apologize
for causing you extra work here.

Discussion:
	160, if the discussion material is there for interoperability as
your comment implies, does it belong in an appendix?
	161, ebRS.pdf, lines 429:411
	162, I have re-read this along with the related CPP/A specifications
and I AGREE WITH YOU [:}]
	172, your complete resolution comments are truncated...

Farrukh, you discussed the fact that you replied to Duane Nickell's issues
156 and 167 but did so privately.  I thought that you offered to forward a
copy of this reply to us.  Please provide a copy of your responses (or
references to the thread) so that we can discuss this issue more openly.

Thanks,
Joel

-----Original Message-----
From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:32 AM
To: 'Oasis RR Comment Resolution'
Subject: [regrep-comresolve] Issue database distribution: 3/15/2002


Team,

Attached please find the issues database (MS Access 2000) and a pdf file
report from the database.
I have taken a first stab at compiling the issues and proposed
resolution based on past emails.

Thanks Joel for providing a set of URLs.

Please study the short list for our meeting on Monday 1-2pm US Eastern.
Logistics to follow.

--
Regards,
Farrukh