[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-comresolve] Issue database distribution: 3/15/2002
Joel, This is a private TC list. Please do not copy non TC members on messages. Thanks for seeding the already planned agenda item: >-Identify any missing issues and log them Lets discuss it tomorrow. Thanks. "Munter, Joel D" wrote: > Farrukh, et al > > We are both referring to the same note [1] from the Oasis ebXML Registry TC > chair, Kathryn. We are interpreting it 180 degrees differently. Please > indulge me by carefully reading my complete argument below. > > I would like to expand on my argument a little in support of the proposed > discussion on Monday. A key "customer" (BP Catalog Team) of the Oasis V2 > Reg/Rep specifications has stated that the design of the unique ID based on > UUID does not currently meet their requirements [2]. The V2 Reg/Rep > specifications reference the standard and well-used UUID scheme. [3, section > 7.3.1] > > The use/adoption of the UUID scheme by the Reg/Rep team is consistent with > how many current specifications (within and outside of the ebXML effort) are > structuring the definition of unique keys. Some relevant questions to ask > then are: Are the requirements [2] being proposed by the BP catalog team > unique to the catalog team? Additionally, were these requirements known to > the ebXML effort at its inception or are they new? Other groups across the > ebXML effort are discussing this issue also. [4] > > If the requirement was recorded early in the ebXML [5,6] effort and the > current specifications do not meet the requirement, then it should be > recorded within this team's V2 issues log. It is my assertion that this > requirement did exist early as evidenced by [6, lines 868:872]. If you all > believe that the requirements noted in [2] have been added since the ebXML > effort began its latter (i.e., V2) phases or the described requirements for > identification have been expanded, then I agree that this issue is not > unique to the Reg/Rep team but in fact is a limitation of all current ebXML > V2 specifications. > > It shows a great deal of maturity and prudence to show your limitations or > to clearly delineate them within an issues log along side the specifications > themselves. There is nothing wrong with doing this. > > [1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200203/msg00030.html > [2] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200202/msg00014.html > [3] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/regrep/documents/2.0/specs/ebrs.pdf > [4] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-cppa/200202/msg00065.html > [5] http://www.ebxml.org/specs/ebREQ.pdf > [6] http://www.ebxml.org/specs/ebTA.pdf > > Joel > > -----Original Message----- > From: Munter, Joel D [mailto:joel.d.munter@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:26 PM > To: 'Oasis RR Comment Resolution' > Subject: RE: [regrep-comresolve] Issue database distribution: 3/15/2002 > > And I based my opinion upon the same criteria so that is why I ask to > discuss this on Monday. > > <snip> > What I want to focus on right now is comments > that are specific to version 2.0 of the specs. > </snip> > > Joel > > -----Original Message----- > From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:02 PM > To: Munter, Joel D > Cc: 'Oasis RR Comment Resolution' > Subject: Re: [regrep-comresolve] Issue database distribution: 3/15/2002 > > Joel, > > I did not make this decision unilaterally. It was based on Katheryn's email > at: > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200203/msg00030.html > > I applied the criterea she had laid out. > > -- > Regards, > Farrukh > > "Munter, Joel D" wrote: > > > Farrukh, > > > > I ask you to please place this as a discussion item on the agenda. This > is > > not your sole decision to make. This is why we have the resolution > > sub-team. The fact is that Kathryn discussed this in several team Reg/Rep > > meetings and the comments themselves from Nita indicate specific things in > > the V2 Reg/Rep that DO NOT meet their requirements. In my mind, that > would > > make this a valid V2 comment. > > > > <snip> > > We(the ebXML BP Catalog team) had a long conversation last > > week with Kathryn about unique identification and what their > > scheme should be. We provided her with our requirements for > > unique identification that was not satisfied by the current > > UUID specification of regrep. The various things that we > > touched base upon were:... > > </snip> > > > > I agree that this may in fact become a V3 work item but I strongly > recommend > > that please record the comment and the agreed disposition. I at least ask > > that we discuss this in our sub-team. > > > > Thanks, > > Joel > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] > > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:42 AM > > To: 'Oasis RR Comment Resolution' > > Subject: Re: [regrep-comresolve] Issue database distribution: 3/15/2002 > > > > I should have noted that I did not include Nita's comments at: > > > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200202/msg00014.html > > > > because: > > > > -They were not directed to V2 specs > > > > -They were part of ongoing discussions between Registry TC and other TCs > > focused on what we need to do for V3. > > > > Please bring to the team's attention any other issues that I might have > > missed. Thanks. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Farrukh > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> -- Regards, Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC