Re: [regrep-semantic] [Q] Is there a need for Semantic ContentManagement Ontology

["Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com>]

As a member of the Business Centric Methodology TC I am very much aware
that the management of Semantic Content is a pre-eminent task when
building towards a Service orieneted Architecture.


Accordingly, I am positioning BCM support as a 'use case' at the high end
of the Ontology Spectrum. That is, I believe the BCM dictates a need for a
capability enabling the 'Haromization of Ontologies' and a capability of
mapping their contents to SOA artifacts.. .. an intuitively complex task.

<quote who="Farrukh Najmi">
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> David RR Webber wrote:
>
>   Zachary,
>
> The OASIS BCM work could certain be distilled in this area
> to provide a formal ontology if you desired.  At the moment
> though the details are woven into the fabric of BCM, and
> not really designed to be standalone.  One  of the outcomes
> of applying the five steps in the BCM method would be
> completing populating that ontology for your specific
> industry domain / CoI.
>
> DW.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Zachary Alexander" >zack2003@ebtdesign.com


-- 
Carl Mattocks

co-Chair OASIS ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC
CEO CHECKMi
v/f (usa) 908 322 8715
www.CHECKMi.com
Semantically Smart Compendiums
(AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi