[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [regrep-semantic] PR2: Explicit support for OWL Ontology/Class in place of ClassificationScheme / ClassificationNode
Farrukh-
Is PR2
the appropriate context to ask questions regarding the (a) "type of OWL" and (b)
"where the OWL interface lies?" Or are these design questions that I can
ask for clarity on later?
Specifically:
(a)
discussion of the tradeoffs and consequences between OWL-F and
OWL-DL
(b) if
the regrep gets queried as usual (and returns an OWL ontology as a 'blob') or if
there are extensions to allow a reasoner to interface the regrep directly
(allowing inferencing against the regrep APIs).
Thanks
for your guidance and clarification.
-Jeff-
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]