Re: [regrep-semantic] PR4: Property as new canonical objectType

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

Absolutely - then we can use these properties to build classes (reusing
them in multiple classes as necessary), which can furthermore be
used/reused to build ontologies.

Joe

ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote:
> 
> PR4. Need objectType to represent a Property
> 
>     We need a new canonical objectType within the canonical
>     ObjectTypeScheme to represent objects of type Property (binary
>     relationship).
> 
>     Motivation: Must be able to identify an Ontology Property within RIM
>     in a standard interoperable manner.