RE: [regrep-semantic] Compiling use case document

["Jeff Pollock" <Jeff.Pollock@networkinference.com>]

SCM Team-

Here is a cut at two new use cases roughly partitioned into Abox vs.
Tbox semantic queries. Both are specializations of the existing Use Case
#6. The two new use cases (#11 & #12) are not mutually exclusive.

I need to take some more time to articulate examples for both, but I
wanted to give you all a slice-of-time version.

Best,

-Jeff- 

-----Original Message-----
From: ewallace@cme.nist.gov [mailto:ewallace@cme.nist.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 6:41 AM
To: regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [regrep-semantic] Compiling use case document



>Is there still interest in getting in some more traditional use cases 
>(vs. what I sent out before) for reasoning in the document?
>
>I had fruitful discussions with some Web Services reps that I may be 
>able to reflect in new use cases.
>
>Tuesday COB (PDT) works for me as well.
>
>-Jeff-

I'd say go for it.  Someone can do a merge of content later.

-Evan

reasoning_queries_UseCaseRegistrySemanticContentManagement.doc