[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] Request for use of XML Schema
Message text written by "Smith, Neal L. (NLSM)" >I request that all V2 specification deliverables (RS and RIM documents) from this team be based on XML Schema. I further request that all proposals and submissions for V2 specifications also be based on XML Schema. I believe that continuing to define DTDs is counterproductive. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< I would like to add a 'where appropriate'. I do not agree that we need to mandate Schema. Having to re-tool DTD's to no good purpose is not sensible. Schema may be required where the extra validation features it brings are needed. A lot of the time the extra overhead may not be justified and a simple DTD is much clearer and quicker. I'm speaking from experience of documenting the CCR/ CRI work in DTD, Schema and RELAX. Each have their strong points. DW.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC