Re: [regrep] Implementing CCTS in Registry - further thoughts

[Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

Regarding XML serialization:

Given the metadata that is defined, wouldn't the XML representation of a
Core Component, BIE, etc. amount to an XML fragment - i.e. a single tag
such as <LocationName> or a set of tags such as <ResidenceAddress> and
its contained elements?  I'm thinking that all of the metadata for the
entity (as a whole) would be defined in the registry, not within the XML
representation itself.  Please let me know if I'm missing something on
this.  The caveat would be that it may not be well-formed XML.

- Joe


David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:
> 
> Message text written by Matthew MacKenzie
> >
> I don't advocate people calling any home cooked XML or CSV a core
> component in their XML registry...I think that will just muddy the waters.
> 
> <<<
> 
> Matt,
> 
> FYI - there are a dozen registries out there already with their
> own XML formats for content.
> 
> Having the ATG specify XML for an OASIS Registry IMHO
> is a fraught path.
> 
> My suggestion is a sub-team of Registry - and we have a
> collaborative effort between the concerned parties:
> 
> My list would include UBL, CAM, UDDI, CCTS, ATG, and
> then other OASIS TC's that want to liaise, along with
> invite to OAGI and DISA X12 to have an observer each.
> 
> DW.

Attachment: Chiusano_Joseph.vcf
Description: Card for Joseph Chiusano