[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] Summary: Implementing CCTS in Registry
Other opinions? Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > <Excerpt> > However in this instance seems like the 'customer' > is wanting us to say how the interface works so that > their choosen representation has the functionality > they need. > </Excerpt> > > David, out of our "who would create a binding" option list (reproduced > below for reference) it appears that you favor (2), or perhaps (3) with > the Registry TC performing most of the work. > > - Joe > > <List> > (1) The CCTS Team is completely responsible for creating a registry > binding > (2) The Registry TC is completely responsible for creating a registry > binding > (3) The CCTS Team and Registry TC are both responsible for > collaboratively creating a binding > (4) An entirely different group (ex: a new OASIS TC) is responsible for > creating the binding (the OASIS "ebXML Registry Bindings TC"?) > (5) The CCTS Team is completely responsible for creating a binding, and > the Registry TC acts in a consultant capacity > </List> > > David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote: > > > > Farrukh, > > > > I'm not sure if this is what they will accept, nor do I see > > this as optimal. Maybe we're thinking about the same > > thing here... > > > > My take on this would be that Registry TC has to > > pick up the ball of defining how to do this > > conceptually. That the Registry TC therefore > > does that heavy lifting of defining the mechanisms > > and available tools. > > > > Then the individual TC's are responsible for their > > own representations and serializations. > > > > However in this instance seems like the 'customer' > > is wanting us to say how the interface works so that > > their choosen representation has the functionality > > they need. > > > > We probably need a sub-task to define those > > big ticket items (I think Joe had something based > > from the CC spec' here summarized). > > > > So I think your 5) below is some of this - but I think > > you are maybe pushing too much back into their > > court of completing the whole binding... > > > > Or maybe I'm just drilling down into 5) here ; -) > > > > Thanks, DW. > > ============================================= > > Message text written by Farrukh Najmi > > > > > 5) The CCTS team is completely responsible for creating a registry > > binding and the registry TC is completely willing to act in a consulatnt > > capacity throughout the process and review ( and even approve if called > > upon) any resulting specs or Best Practice papers. > > <
Attachment:
Chiusano_Joseph.vcf
Description: Card for Joseph Chiusano
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC