OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [regrep] Interest in Ontology Process Control Subcommittee


Zachary,

That is why we are doing the SCM work on noun definitions
and business catalogues - so we can suggest how people
can do this.  Of course we cannot force them to do it that
way - but we can give them what we think is a good way
to start from.  As you note - this builds that neutral base
across groups - hopefully!

Thanks, DW.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Zachary Alexander" <zack2003@ebtdesign.com>
To: "'ebXML Regrep (ebXML Regrep)'" <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 6:40 PM
Subject: RE: [regrep] Interest in Ontology Process Control Subcommittee


>
> <Farrukh> It by design leaves vertical (industry specific) content
> definition to other standards such as UBL etc. </Farrukh> If logic
> systems imply content definitions, should the ebXML Registry be modified
> to promote compliance with a single logic system like Description
> Logics? Or, should the ebXML Registry require application developers to
> figure out how best to utilize the intrinsic registry characteristics to
> support their applications.
>
> If the registry by design leaves vertical (industry specific) content
> definition to other standards, why would it define a native
> content/logic system? Doesn't that invalidate the principle of payload
> neutrality?
>
> Zachary Alexander
> The IT Investment Architect
> ebTDesign LLC, (703) 283-4325
> http://www.ebTDesign.com | http://www.p2peconomy.com |
> http://www.itinvestmentvehicle.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 6:26 PM
> To: Zachary Alexander
> Cc: 'ebXML Regrep (ebXML Regrep)'
> Subject: Re: [regrep] Interest in Ontology Process Control Subcommittee
>
> Zachary Alexander wrote:
>
> >Joe,
> >
> >Currently, the ebXML Family of standards handle XML content in a
> payload
> >neutral manner. Is that a design decision or is that a best practice?
> >
> >
> Hi Zach,
>
> ebXML is by design a horizontal standard that works across all
> industries.
> It by design leaves vertical (industry specific) content definition to
> other standards
> such as UBL etc.
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Farrukh
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]