Re: [regrep] Proposed changes to ebMS Binding and HTTP Binding

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

Farrukh Najmi wrote:

> I do not think it sends a negative message. 

I would concur with this.  It makes very little sense to spend any ore 
time on something very few are wanting.  We should not be arrogant in 
the endeavor to make everything appear ebXML-ish at the cost of sound 
technical reasoning and customer requirements.

If I have two tools - a small hammer and a sledgehammer, I will use a 
different one depending on whether I hang a small nail for a picture 
frame or take out a iron railing.

Duane



-- 
***********
Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
Chair - OASIS eb SOA TC - http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ebsoa
***********