[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] RE : [Fwd: [regrep] New ballot"Vote on cc-Review subteam report" (WAS RE:[regrep] Standards approvalprocess)]
I have to agree with Joseph. This makes far more sense than defining another API for the same thing (unless there is some additional functionality). Duane Chiusano Joseph wrote: ><Quote> >for example a "getABIE()" method, has to retrieve full definition components (ABIE with its BBIE and ASBIE properties) in an atomic call. ></Quote> > >Why not a "getRegistryObject()"* method with one of the parameters signifying ObjectType of "Core Component"? > >*may not be the exact name (sent quickly without opening spec - sorry) > >Kind Regards, >Joseph Chiusano >Booz Allen Hamilton >Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE [mailto:ivan.bedini@francetelecom.com] >>Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 12:52 PM >>To: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org >>Subject: [regrep] RE : [Fwd: [regrep] New ballot "Vote on >>cc-Review subteam report" (WAS RE:[regrep] Standards approval >>process)] >> >>Thanks Farrukh, we agree to edit the mapping and to submit a >>draft ASAP to the TC. >> >> >>Only to give an example, please find attached to this mail >>UBL Invoice Structure, which represent a "complete" ABIE. >>The files are : >>- one in EDIFRANCE BS xml format (which isn't 100% compliant >>to CCTS yet...) >>- the other is the BS schema >>- the last is the ebRIM format (it is only an example, the >>inner assosiactions are not provided in the file) >> >>The ebRIM format shows why I spoke about a dedicated API for >>CC. When I retrieve a generic CC in reality I need to >>retrieve all associated sub-component and that couldn't be >>done by a simple request provided by the QueryManager In >>fact, for example a "getABIE()" method, has to retrieve full >>definition components (ABIE with its BBIE and ASBIE >>properties) in an atomic call. >> >>Rgards, >>Ivan >> >> >> >>-----Message d'origine----- >>De : Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] Envoyé : >>lundi 17 janvier 2005 22:16 À : regrep@lists.oasis-open.org >>Objet : Re: [Fwd: [regrep] New ballot "Vote on cc-Review >>subteam report" (WAS RE:[regrep] Standards approval process)] >> >> >>Resending after fixing the subject per Joe's earlier suggestion. >> >>Sorry I think it was me who replied to the wrong message at >>the begining >>of this thread. Please try and use the subject Joe started in >>response. >> >>Thanks. >> >>BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE wrote: >> >> >> >>>I'm sorry but the mapping is not so simple: >>>the better solution for ASCC and ASBIE is an ebRIM association or an >>>extrinsic object ? do we need a dedicated registry object for BCC, >>>BBIE, ASCC, ASBIE properties or an association is enough? >>>Business Context will be a registry classification or an extrinsic >>>object ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>I think Ivan touches on an important point above... That the >>fundemental issue is the mapping between two information models: >> >>a) The CCTS Information Model (source model) >> >>b) The ebXML Registry Information Model (target model) >> >>Both models are defined in UML and a mapping between the two >>should be the main focus. Such a mapping should be an >>abstract mapping that is independent of Serialization or >>Storage formats at least initialy. >> >>This whole debate about which comes first: Serialization >>format or Storage format is not the core issue to debate IMHO. >> >>Instead we should be debating on the mapping issues between >>the two models (see Iva's examles above) and using the ebXML >>Registry Tutorial: >> >> http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/tmp/regrep-tutorial-draft-04.pdf >> >>as a key input when trying solution to mapping problems. >> >>BTW, is any one able to take Editorship of above document >>from me as I have become a bottleneck on that document? Ivan, >>would you be interested given that you and your colleagues >>have been using this document since its earliest version and >>have some practical experience with its content? >> >>Thanks. >> >> >>-- >>Regards, >>Farrukh >> >> >> >>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from >>the roster of the OASIS TC), go to >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/le >>ave_workgroup.php. >> >> >> >> > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > > -- *********** Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/ Chair - OASIS eb SOA TC - http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ebsoa ***********
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]