OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [regrep] Whither ebRS conformance testing?

I believe that we may have an opportunity to work with OASIS to provide
additional visibility of ebXML implementations.  I would like to see
these available through our TC site and/or an umbrella ebXML site in

Kathryn Breininger
Boeing Library Services
425-965-0182 phone

-----Original Message-----
From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] 
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 8:48 AM
To: Richard Martell
Cc: 'Michael Kass'; Breininger, Kathryn R; regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [regrep] Whither ebRS conformance testing?

Richard Martell wrote:

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Michael Kass [mailto:michael.kass@NIST.GOV]
>>Sent: Wednesday, 04 May, 2005 08:03
>>To: Breininger, Kathryn R; Farrukh Najmi; Richard Martell
>>Cc: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
>>Subject: Re: [regrep] Whither ebRS conformance testing?
>>    We (NIST) did a small set of tests for ebRS 2.1.  We realized that

>>3.0 was the target, but just wanted a proof of concept of the
>>Test Framework
>>1.1, and we had the 2.1 ebXML registry available to test against.
>>     NIST will not be generating any new tests for any ebXML 
>>technologies (MS, Registry, BP).  Any new tests or test requirements 
>>will have to be
>>generated by OASIS TC members.
>>     The POC ebXML Test Framework implementation is freely available 
>>for anyone to use, extend and write tests for.  Please note that
>>it is not yet
>>complete.  Many functions defined in the ebXML Test Framework v1.1.
>>specification are not implemented in our POC.
>Would the existing NIST implementation of the ebXML test framework be a

>candidate for inclusion as a new freebXML project?
If it is an ebXML related project which sounds like it is and if it can 
be available on a royalty free basis then it is a good candidate for
inclusion in freebXML.org projects. I would support this very 
strongly because the more we can get RF ebXML projects
under one umbrella (freebXML.org) the more critical mass we have and the

more cohesive the community of users and developers.

Thanks for the excellent suggestion. Mike is this idea something that 
you would consider? Thanks.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]