[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [regrep] RE: DNS like distributed search for RegistryObjects
Great idea. Joe Joseph Chiusano Associate Booz Allen Hamilton 700 13th St. NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20005 O: 202-508-6514 C: 202-251-0731 Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com -----Original Message----- From: Matt MacKenzie [mailto:mattm@adobe.com] Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 8:45 AM To: Farrukh Najmi; regrep@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: john@maphin.net Subject: [regrep] RE: DNS like distributed search for RegistryObjects It is possible to represent a classification scheme using DNS-SD...which I think is a great idea as it would allow for very fine grained partitioning. Please let me know how I can help, I'll try my best to find some time. -matt -----Original Message----- From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 8:14 AM To: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: john@maphin.net; Matt MacKenzie Subject: DNS like distributed search for RegistryObjects Dear Colleagues, Attached is an email from John Hardin whom many of you may know already. John's email has reminded me of the the need for the TC to define a DNS like distributed search for RegistryObjects. He shares a very real use case from Electronic Patient Records world on how important this functionality is. I share this sense of importance and would like to propose that we as a TC consider starting a work item focused on defining a normative spec addressing this requirement. As a starring point we could study past work by Matt MacKenzie on the subject: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/6852/tn-ebreg-dnssd-02 .htm l What do Matt and TC colleagues think? -- Regards, Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]