Re: DNS like distributed search for RegistryObjects

[Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>]

Matt MacKenzie wrote:

>It is possible to represent a classification scheme using DNS-SD...which I
>think is a great idea as it would allow for very fine grained partitioning.
>Please let me know how I can help, I'll try my best to find some time.
>  
>

Hi Matt,

Thank you very much for offering to help. I think you were ahead of the 
times with your earlier work on this area :-)
Lets think about this some more and discuss next steps over email next 
week. Thanks again.

>-matt
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] 
>Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 8:14 AM
>To: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
>Cc: john@maphin.net; Matt MacKenzie
>Subject: DNS like distributed search for RegistryObjects
>
>
>Dear Colleagues,
>
>Attached is an email from John Hardin whom many of you may know already.
>
>John's email has reminded me of the the need for the TC to define a DNS 
>like distributed search for RegistryObjects.
>He shares a very real use case from Electronic Patient Records world on 
>how important this functionality is.
>
>I share this sense of importance and would like to propose that we as a 
>TC consider starting a work item focused on
>defining a normative spec addressing this requirement. As a starring 
>point we could study past work by Matt MacKenzie on the subject:
>
>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/6852/tn-ebreg-dnssd-02.htm
>l 
>
>
>What do Matt and TC colleagues think?
>
>  
>


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh


begin:vcard
fn:Farrukh Najmi
n:Najmi;Farrukh
email;internet:farrukh.najmi@sun.com
tel;work:781-442-9017
url:http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/tmp/DSCN0278.JPG
version:2.1
end:vcard