Re: TREX for TREX without namespace

[James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>]

A more basic question is whether TREX should require the use of the TREX
namespace or whether it should continue to allow no namespace to be used
for TREX elements.

(Using the term "default namespace" to refer to an absent or null
namespace is a little confusing, since the XML Namespace Rec uses
"default namespace" to refer to the namespace declared by the "xmlns"
attribute.)

James Tauber wrote:
> 
> The current TREX for TREX assumes the TREX namespace is being used.
> 
> Should/could it allow for both the case where the schema being validated
> uses the TREX namespace OR the default namespace?
> 
> James Tauber