[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: suggested change to spec in light of PyTREX bug
I just fixed a bug in PyTREX pointed out by James Clark. It came about because of a misinterpretation of the spec on my part. The spec reads: M [[<t:attribute> name-class pattern </t:attribute>]] (a, c, e) if and only if c is empty, and a consists of an attribute <t:n,v>, and C [[name-class]](n), and M [[pattern]]({}, v, e) I took this to mean that a could consist of any number of attributes of which one needed to be <t:n,v> rather than that a must consist of a single attribute <t:n,v> Upon reflection, it is obvious it should be the latter but I wonder if there would be value in change it to read "a consists of a _single_ attribute <t:n,v>". James
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC