RE: Name change

[Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>]

Pronouncing RELAX NG as RELAXing does sort of roll off the tongue. It's
growing on me... -Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Clark [mailto:jjc@jclark.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 2:14 AM
> To: TREX
> Subject: Re: Name change
>
>
> Another thought: Relax NG could be pronounced "relaxing"...
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Clark" <jjc@jclark.com>
> To: "TREX" <trex@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 3:06 PM
> Subject: Name change
>
>
> > > 10. Name change. James - blending of Relax/TREX name hard to
> do, but we
> > > don't want a completely new name [because it would suggest a
> proliferation
> > > of schema languages which we don't want]. James - I think we should go
> > with
> > > Relax 2.0 or some adjective [or tag], don't like what "2.0" suggests
> > though.
> > > M.-san - I like this. It will be easier to advance JIS/ISO
> specs. Josh -
> > > Relax .NET? K.-san - Relax++? James - Relax NG [Next Generation]?
> >
> > One other consideration. It would be good to have a name for which we
> could
> > acquire the corresponding .org address. (I registered relax2.org and
> > relaxng.org already; if we choose one of these I will donate it
> to OASIS.)
> >
> > I thought of iRelax (for improved Relax) but irelax.org doesn't
> seem to be
> > available.
> >
> > James
>
>
>