RE: Name change

[Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>]

I like iRELAX as well, as in "increment RELAX." If the domain is not
available, you could innovate, e.g., OASIS had to with oasis-open.org. -Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Clark [mailto:jjc@jclark.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 1:06 AM
> To: TREX
> Subject: Name change
>
>
> > 10. Name change. James - blending of Relax/TREX name hard to do, but we
> > don't want a completely new name [because it would suggest a
> proliferation
> > of schema languages which we don't want]. James - I think we should go
> with
> > Relax 2.0 or some adjective [or tag], don't like what "2.0" suggests
> though.
> > M.-san - I like this. It will be easier to advance JIS/ISO specs. Josh -
> > Relax .NET? K.-san - Relax++? James - Relax NG [Next Generation]?
>
> One other consideration. It would be good to have a name for
> which we could
> acquire the corresponding .org address. (I registered relax2.org and
> relaxng.org already; if we choose one of these I will donate it to OASIS.)
>
> I thought of iRelax (for improved Relax) but irelax.org doesn't seem to be
> available.
>
> James
>
>
>