Issue: redefinition without the original

[Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <kohsuke.kawaguchi@eng.sun.com>]

> I don't think the proposal addressed this issue.
> 
> Your example seems to be mixing two different issues.  Consider just:
> 
> A.rng
>   <grammar>
>     <include href="B.rng">
>       <define name="foo"> ... </define>
>     </include>
>   </grammar>
> 
>   B.rng
>   <grammar/>
> 
> If the user has done this, then they have probably made a mistake.  On the
> other hand the semantics are clear.  We can either make this an error or
> suggest that implementations give a warning.  Please open an issue on this
> one.

The following example might be more complex:

A.rng:
<grammar>
  <include href="B.rng"/>
  <include href="C.rng">
    <define name="foo"> .... </define>
  </include>
</grammar>

B.rng:
<grammar>
  <define name="foo"> ... </define>
</grammar>

C.rng:
<grammar/>


I prefer to allow this because this restriction is difficult to
implement.

--
Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI                          +1 650 786 0721
Sun Microsystems                   kohsuke.kawaguchi@eng.sun.com