Re: Tutorial update

[Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <kohsuke.kawaguchi@eng.sun.com>]

> > <rng:grammar xmlns:rng="..." xmlns="W3C XML Schema Part 2">
> >   <rng:data type="string" />
> > </rng:grammar>
> >
> > Is the above data considered as the built-in string? Or XML Schema Part
> > 2 string?
> 
> I would have said the former.   It's important to be able to put the pattern
> into a normal form where namespace declarations are not significant, so:

As you suggested, adding a datatypeNamespace looks fine for me.


--
Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI                          +1 650 786 0721
Sun Microsystems                   kohsuke.kawaguchi@eng.sun.com